|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 10/3/2009 Posts: 407
|
Am I the only person who looks at some of the half marathon plans and thinks I can't be bothered with 400m sprints 1 minute rests and all that, is the concensus that they are useful and does it have to be that accurate?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/18/2008 Posts: 149
|
hello johnnyh it does not have to be that accurate mate,i only use training plans has a guide.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/29/2008 Posts: 1,610
|
100% agree, never bothered with speed work. I will add some at some stage but it`ll be fartlek style.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 5/30/2009 Posts: 1,174
|
johnnyh wrote:Am I the only person who looks at some of the half marathon plans and thinks I can't be bothered with 400m sprints 1 minute rests and all that, is the concensus that they are useful and does it have to be that accurate? Zatopek used to do 400m reps - 40 of them! They do actually do good, but precision is not relevant. My 400m reps are 10 lamp-posts, which I've measured at 43 lamp-posts in 1.25 miles, close enough for me. If your aim is a 4-minute mile, it's useful to know that you can run a 60 second 1/4 mile, and repeat it. Otherwise, as long as you're putting your system under pressure, it's good. It works because you are better able to stress your aerobic system to the limit and do it again, whereas your long run won't take you to that limit, except maybe near the end.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/29/2008 Posts: 1,610
|
Bernie Bear wrote:johnnyh wrote:Am I the only person who looks at some of the half marathon plans and thinks I can't be bothered with 400m sprints 1 minute rests and all that, is the concensus that they are useful and does it have to be that accurate? Zatopek used to do 400m reps - 40 of them! They do actually do good, but precision is not relevant. My 400m reps are 10 lamp-posts, which I've measured at 43 lamp-posts in 1.25 miles, close enough for me. If your aim is a 4-minute mile, it's useful to know that you can run a 60 second 1/4 mile, and repeat it. Otherwise, as long as you're putting your system under pressure, it's good. It works because you are better able to stress your aerobic system to the limit and do it again, whereas your long run won't take you to that limit, except maybe near the end. I dont doubt they work. But when i look at a plan and see anything complicated or restrictive it leaves me cold. I like to run as i fancy it, the only saving grace is i always seem to run at threshold pace anyway, its just my nature.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 5/30/2009 Posts: 1,174
|
enigmauk wrote:Bernie Bear wrote:johnnyh wrote:Am I the only person who looks at some of the half marathon plans and thinks I can't be bothered with 400m sprints 1 minute rests and all that, is the concensus that they are useful and does it have to be that accurate? Zatopek used to do 400m reps - 40 of them! They do actually do good, but precision is not relevant. My 400m reps are 10 lamp-posts, which I've measured at 43 lamp-posts in 1.25 miles, close enough for me. If your aim is a 4-minute mile, it's useful to know that you can run a 60 second 1/4 mile, and repeat it. Otherwise, as long as you're putting your system under pressure, it's good. It works because you are better able to stress your aerobic system to the limit and do it again, whereas your long run won't take you to that limit, except maybe near the end. I dont doubt they work. But when i look at a plan and see anything complicated or restrictive it leaves me cold. I like to run as i fancy it, the only saving grace is i always seem to run at threshold pace anyway, its just my nature. Hi Enigma, I'm with you all the way about "running as you fancy", however there is good evidence that intervals DO enable you to run faster, and it's NOT just for short-distance guys (viz Zatopek). I include intervals in my schedule without following a plan, other than "if it's Tuesday, it's speedwork day" (OK, I'm the kind of sad person who needs a familiar routine to be comfortable!)
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/29/2008 Posts: 1,610
|
Hi Bernie, Oh im very sad and border line OCD, which is I expect why I run with so little variation. 7 to 11 k at threshold pace is my entire training routine!
I know Im heading for injury again as after months out all i want to do is run a hard 10k most days. I must must must download a 5k schedule and follow it for a few weeks.
Recovery runs, ummm not for me!
Hold me back! I almost want to break my knee again to see where the limit is.
Im looking at a 20 mile race next month, could i do it off the back of a couple of weeks training? It would be "interesting" to find out . . .
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/28/2009 Posts: 1,249
|
I feel like I've had good results with interval training, having recently brought my 10k time down by a minute and a half since I started "proper" intervals as part of my marathon training. Fartlek is good fun but I find it too easy to wimp out and not push myself. With a predetermined interval session I know what I have to achieve - taking it easy isn't an option.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/29/2008 Posts: 1,610
|
AdamT wrote:Fartlek is good fun but I find it too easy to wimp out and not push myself. I to expect suffer from that! But I dont feel its worth getting dressed up and sweaty just to do 10 x 200m for instance. Even if i ran till i felt sick it wouldnt feel right. Im totally bonkers and out on a limb but there you are.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 2/9/2009 Posts: 547
|
hmmmmmm, how to answer this..................ponder..................hmmmmmmm..........difficult this........hmmmm.............here goes:
Precision is very important but not in distances and time. To get the most from your training it is best to work at a certain level for the right length of time.
e.g. ONCE A WEEK threshold session for between 20 and 40 minutes be it reps or a whole run, roughly half marathon pace. This gives you the ability to run fast for longer by making your body better at dealing with lactic acid
the 400m are for VO2 Max and really I prefer 800m anyway, but what you are trying to do is run your 5km pace for between 1 and 7minuntes from between 4 and 12 times so you are in the zone for about 15 - 20 minutes. this makes you faster by allowing more oxygen to get to your muscles.
You will improve more if you improve both as they both effect performance (along with pure stamina). If you do one is isolation you will find a arificially low ceiling in your performance e.g. you could be not producing much lactic acid and clearing well but you don't supply enough oxygen so you can't go any faster.
So precision is very important but that precision is in the amount of effort you put in (not to much, as well as not too little) it doesn't matter about the distance or time really.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/29/2008 Posts: 1,610
|
Interesting stuff Choisty. These times are based on marathon training? Would you adjust these significantly for a 5 or 10k plan?
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/28/2009 Posts: 902
|
I've got to HM distance without following a plan so far - just got out and run my backside off, though I think to get to marathon distance I would need a plan.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/29/2008 Posts: 1,610
|
Lozzer wrote:I've got to HM distance without following a plan so far Me too. I dont think you need a plan for any distance, to get your best time, yes but just to get round, no. As long as you use some common sense in training, obviously longer slower runs in marathon training and shorter faster ones for 5k!
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 2/9/2009 Posts: 547
|
Lozzer you're right you don't need plan to run, just get out there and do it afterall that's what we are built for! However to run faster for longer you can improve quicker if you train to do so. All it is, is what you want from your running, no I'm just a little competitive!
Enigmauk, Both are need to produce best results but the focus must be on shorter VO2 Max reps as your VO2 Max is the usually the rate determining factor for 5km. So 400m reps and lots of them! the session I hate but works is between 12 and 20 x 400m, every other week for about 2 months, with 1min hill reps on the weeks between about 20-30mins worth each time.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 2/9/2009 Posts: 547
|
Lozzer, I got to marathon without a plan 2 years later with a plan I run over 40mins quicker. They aren't needed, but they help, and personality plays a part as they can either be a crutch which helps you through or a cadge which stops you
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/29/2008 Posts: 1,610
|
Thanks Choisty. Im going to follow a 5k schedule from Hal Higdon - any feedback welcome. I dont have a race in mind yet but a PB this summer would be good! I will look to tweak the schedule a bit bearing in mind your advice above, he seems to have no hill work. And i`ll be doing quite a bit of cross training as well, and 2 - 3 weight sessions a week. I just need this week to ease back in, im still sore from my comeback run on Sunday, really shouldnt have done an hour! 5k Training Plan
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 5/30/2009 Posts: 1,174
|
enigmauk wrote:Thanks Choisty. Im going to follow a 5k schedule from Hal Higdon - any feedback welcome. I dont have a race in mind yet but a PB this summer would be good! I will look to tweak the schedule a bit bearing in mind your advice above, he seems to have no hill work. And i`ll be doing quite a bit of cross training as well, and 2 - 3 weight sessions a week. I just need this week to ease back in, im still sore from my comeback run on Sunday, really shouldnt have done an hour! 5k Training Plan Looks a good plan, Enigma. I was particularly amused that he says "An important addendum to any training program is stretching. Don't overlook it"! He also suggests that you should be running 25-30 miles a week before you start this plan...
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/29/2008 Posts: 1,610
|
Hi Bernie, I was averaging around the 20-25 miles a week up till September. Lets hope i bounce back to where i was quickly! Im sure they are over cautious with such recommendations lest they are blamed for peoples injurys etc.
I wont be stretching im afraid but i will be doing some strength work, which is another inportant addendum according to Hal . . . .
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 2/9/2009 Posts: 547
|
Looks a good plan to me, hills just work you over big time and when racing you have that metal toughness to fall back on hence my love/hate relationship with them. I've got 30mins of hills on thursday doh! If your looking for a race series there is always Portmouth Prom series http://www.portsmouthathletic.co.uk/downloads/Entry-Forms/Promenade%205k.pdf 5 races from june to september on a wednesday evening, very quick so a PB is possible.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/29/2008 Posts: 1,610
|
Thanks for the link Choisty. Portsmouth is probably a bit far for me to go mid week to be honest ( from Bournemouth).
Well I`ll kick off the Hal programme next week then.
Its a 8 week plan building up to a race. How would you follow a plan long term? Just keep repeating it (without the taper week) ? Take an average and just repeat endlessly with minor tweaks as you evolve?
|
|
|
RunningBug Forum |